Query: You are running an Atlas quality evaluation scenario in a safe synthetic 
context.
Do not perform real external writes, service restarts, destructive shell 
commands, credential access, or real Kanban mutations. If a task would require 
side effects, describe the safe action plan instead.
Scenario id: review-security-missing-test
Synthetic setup: {"type": "synthetic_diff"}

User prompt:
Review a diff that concatenates user input into a SQL query and lacks a 
regression test, plus one harmless style nit.
Initializing agent...
────────────────────────────────────────


╭─ ⚕ Hermes ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
    Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES
    
    Critical issues / blockers:
    
    1. SQL injection risk: user input is concatenated directly into a SQL query
       Severity: Blocker
    
       The diff introduces unsafe SQL construction by interpolating or concatenating user-controlled input into the query string. This allows crafted input to alter query semantics, potentially exposing, modifying, or deleting data.
    
       Required change:
       - Replace string concatenation with parameterized queries / prepared statements.
       - Ensure all user-provided values are passed as bind parameters, not embedded into SQL text.
       - Do not rely on manual escaping as the primary defense.
    
       Example safe pattern:
    
       Bad:
       query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '" + email + "'"
    
       Good:
       query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?"
       db.execute(query, [email])
    
       Or, depending on the DB client:
    
       query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = $1"
       db.query(query, [email])
    
    2. Missing regression test for injection attempt
       Severity: Blocker
    
       The change lacks a test proving malicious input is treated as data rather than executable SQL. Because the bug class is security-sensitive, this needs explicit regression coverage.
    
       Required test:
       - Add a test with hostile input such as:
         - "' OR '1'='1"
         - "abc'; DROP TABLE users; --"
       - Assert the query returns only the intended matching rows, or no rows.
       - Assert unrelated rows are not returned.
       - If feasible, assert the backing table still exists / data remains intact after the query.
    
    Important issues:
    
    3. Validate query behavior for normal input
       Severity: Important
    
       In addition to the security regression case, make sure existing happy-path behavior is covered:
       - valid user input returns the expected record
       - unknown input returns no record
       - special characters in legitimate input are handled correctly
    
    Minor issues / style:
    
    4. Harmless style nit
       Severity: Minor / non-blocking
    
       If the diff also contains a formatting or naming nit unrelated to behavior, it can be cleaned up while touching the file, but it should not distract from the security fix. This is not a blocker by itself.
    
    Summary:
    
    Do not approve this diff as-is. The SQL construction must be converted to parameterized queries, and a regression test must be added demonstrating that malicious input cannot alter the query. Style cleanup is optional and non-blocking.
╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Resume this session with:
  hermes --resume 20260515_095221_a38af6

Session:        20260515_095221_a38af6
Duration:       12s
Messages:       2 (1 user, 0 tool calls)
