---
type: atlas-artifact
artifact_type: status-report
project: "Atlas Capability Upgrade Program"
status: accepted
owner: "writer profile / Atlas docs owner"
created: 2026-05-14
updated: 2026-05-14
source: "kanban:t_6f875045"
reviewer: "reviewer profile"
tags: [atlas, artifact, status-report]
---

# Status Report: Workstream 8 Artifact Generation System

Parent project: [[Atlas Capability Upgrade Program]]
Source: kanban:t_6f875045

## Reporting period

2026-05-14 to 2026-05-14.

## Overall status

Green.

Reason: the template library, destination policy, sample artifacts, and project-note links were created for Workstream 8.

## Completed work

- Created `Templates/Atlas Artifacts/README.md` with destination, naming, promotion, and linking conventions.
- Created seven artifact templates plus `reviewer-checklist.md`.
- Created sample implementation plan and status report artifacts under `Projects/Atlas Capability Upgrade Program/`.
- Linked the artifact system from [[Atlas Capability Upgrade Program]].

## Current blockers

- None for the documentation implementation.
- Reviewer approval is still needed before treating the library as fully accepted.

## Risks

- Risk: agents may overproduce verbose artifacts. Mitigation: templates allow concise sections and N/A with reason.
- Risk: future workers may forget to link artifacts. Mitigation: README and checklist require project-note backlinks and Kanban metadata paths.

## Next actions

- [ ] Owner: reviewer profile. Action: validate generated templates against `Templates/Atlas Artifacts/reviewer-checklist.md`.
- [ ] Owner: Atlas docs owner. Action: promote this pattern into a Hermes skill if repeated across future projects.

## Decisions needed

- None immediately.

## Links to artifacts created this period

- [[Templates/Atlas Artifacts/README|Atlas Artifact Templates]] — template library index.
- [[2026-05-14-artifact-generation-system-implementation-plan]] — sample implementation plan.
- [[2026-05-14-status-report]] — this sample status report.

## Status-report-specific review checklist

- [x] Status color is justified.
- [x] Blockers, risks, and next actions have owners.
- [x] Created artifacts are linked.
- [x] Decisions needed are explicit.

## Universal reviewer checklist

- [x] Clear owner, status, date, source, and next action.
- [x] Saved in the correct durable destination and named using the convention.
- [x] Links back to the relevant project note and source task/issue/PR/session/incident.
- [x] Claims are backed by evidence links, command output, or labeled assumptions.
- [x] Risks, rollback, recovery, or revisit triggers are documented where relevant.
- [x] No secrets, tokens, raw PII, private keys, or unredacted credentials are included.
- [x] A new specialist can understand the artifact without rereading the whole chat.
