# Session: 2026-03-03 18:00:45 UTC - **Session Key**: agent:main:main - **Session ID**: fe1b7054-41fb-462f-8177-f4e8998f988b - **Source**: gateway:sessions.reset ## Conversation Summary assistant: [[reply_to_current]] Done — updated. ### What’s now in `litellm-config.yaml` - **Gemini** was already present: - `gemini-1.5-pro` - `gemini-1.5-flash` - **z.ai** added: - `zai-glm-4.7` - `zai-glm-4.7-flash` - both using: - `api_base: https://api.z.ai/api/coding/paas/v4` - `api_key: os.environ/ZAI_API_KEY` If you want, I can also add newer Gemini aliases (e.g. 2.x) and/or switch Gemini key var from `GOOGLE_API_KEY` to `GEMINI_API_KEY` if that’s what your env uses. user: [Tue 2026-03-03 09:37 UTC] Update the file accordingly based on the currently configured providers assistant: [[reply_to_current]] Done — I updated `litellm-config.yaml` to match the providers currently configured on this host. ### Kept (configured) - OpenAI-compatible local endpoint (`OPENAI_BASE_URL` + `OPENAI_API_KEY`) - z.ai (`ZAI_API_KEY`, base `https://api.z.ai/api/coding/paas/v4`) - `glm-5` - `glm-4.7` - `glm-4.7-flash` - `glm-4.7-flashx` ### Removed (not currently configured) - Anthropic - OpenRouter - Opencode - Gemini If you want Gemini included too, I can add it back with `GEMINI_API_KEY` entries as soon as you confirm that key/env is set. user: [Tue 2026-03-03 09:42 UTC] We have litellm fixed. Can you test it? assistant: [[reply_to_current]] I tested from here — current status: - `http://192.168.153.113:18805/v1/models` responds, but returns TTS models (`kokoro`, `tts-1`, etc.), not your LiteLLM model list. - `http://192.168.153.113:18805/v1/chat/completions` returns `404 Not Found`. - No local LiteLLM listener appears to be running on this host (`127.0.0.1:4000/8000` not reachable). So LiteLLM itself is likely on a different port/host (or not started yet). If you share the exact LiteLLM base URL (e.g. `http://:/v1`), I’ll run a real end-to-end test immediately. user: [Tue 2026-03-03 09:43 UTC] NAME IMAGE COMMAND SERVICE CREATED STATUS PORTS brave-search mcp/brave-search:latest "node dist/index.js" brave-search 2 hours ago Up 2 hours 0.0.0.0:18802->8000/tcp, [::]:18802->8000/tcp kokoro-tts ghcr.io/remsky/kokoro-fastapi-cpu:latest "./entrypoint.sh" kokoro-tts 2 hours ago Up 2 hours 0.0.0.0:18805->8880/tcp, [::]:18805->8880/tcp litellm litellm/litellm:latest "docker/prod_entrypo…" litellm 2 hours ago Up 3 minutes (unhealthy) 0.0.0.0:18804->4000/tcp, [::]:18804->4000/tcp searxng searxng/searxng:latest "/usr/local/searxng/…" searxng 2 hours ago Up 2 hours 0.0.0.0:18803->8080/tcp, [::]:18803->8080/tcp whisper-server ghcr.io/ggml-org/whisper.cpp:main "whisper-server --mo…" whisper-server 2 hours ago Up 2 hours (healthy) 0.0.0.0:18801->8080/tcp, [::]:18801->8080/tcp assistant: [[reply_to_current]] Yep — tested. Good news/bad news: ✅ **LiteLLM is reachable** at `:18804` and serving model aliases: - `gpt-4o` - `gpt-4-turbo` - `zai-glm-5` - `zai-glm-4.7` - `zai-glm-4.7-flash` - `zai-glm-4.7-flashx` ❌ **Actual completions fail** (auth upstream): - `zai-glm-4.7-flash` returns `Authentication parameter not received in Header` - Health endpoint shows all configured backends unhealthy for missing upstream API keys. So your LiteLLM config is loaded, but container env is missing provider keys (`ZAI_API_KEY`, and for OpenAI route, `OPENAI_API_KEY` if used upstream directly). If you want, I can give you a minimal `docker-compose` env block to make it green in one restart. user: [Tue 2026-03-03 10:09 UTC] Can you try to hit the litellm API? Here is a virtual key: sk-IlDTV8FaW0vTUL_a4VDhMw assistant: [[reply_to_current]] Tested with your virtual key. - `GET /v1/models` ✅ works (returns your configured aliases) - `POST /v1/chat/completions` ❌ still fails: - `zai-glm-4.7-flash`: upstream auth missing - `gpt-4o`: upstream OpenAI API key missing So your **virtual key is valid for LiteLLM**, but LiteLLM itself still lacks provider creds in its container env. You need to set (at least): - `ZAI_API_KEY` (for z.ai models) - `OPENAI_API_KEY` (for gpt-4o / gpt-4-turbo) Then restart litellm container and re-test. user: [Tue 2026-03-03 10:41 UTC] ok test now assistant: [[reply_to_current]] Yep — much better now. I re-tested and it’s working. ### Results - `/v1/models` ✅ returns models (now includes Claude/Gemini/z.ai aliases too). - `gpt-4o` chat completion ✅ returned `OK`. - `zai-glm-4.7-flash` chat completion ✅ works too (returned `OK` when given enough tokens). - `/health` now shows partial recovery: **7 healthy / 4 unhealthy**. So LiteLLM is up and functional with your virtual key. If you want, I can run one quick probe to list exactly which 4 models are still unhealthy. user: [Tue 2026-03-03 11:07 UTC] Test litellm with gpt-5-mini assistant: [[reply_to_current]] Tested. `gpt-5-mini` currently fails on your LiteLLM with: > no healthy deployments for this model (`model=gpt-5-mini`) So it isn’t mapped/configured (or healthy) in your current LiteLLM setup yet. user: [Tue 2026-03-03 11:08 UTC] Test litellm with openai/gpt-5-mini assistant: [[reply_to_current]] Tested `openai/gpt-5-mini`. Result: ❌ fails with: `OpenAIException - Unknown parameter: 'credential_name'` So this route is being attempted, but there’s a provider-side/request-shape mismatch in the current LiteLLM/OpenAI config for that model.